R9 290X benchmark with Phenom 9150e 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Low Quality
At 1440p, R9 290X can hit 50-60 fps on pretty much everything at ultra, just without antialiasing, less ambient occlusion and turned down shadows. It is worth noting that the R9 290X is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. It is important to know that R9 290X 's max load temperature is very high and might require custom cooling solutions. This combination between R9 290X and AMD Phenom 9150e Quad-Core is going to cause serious bottlenecks in many games and cause severe FPS loss. With current 4096 MB RAM, the R9 290X can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
driver support.
Year
2016
2019
13
2015
2016
11
2014
2015
8
2013
2014
4
2007
2013
2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.
Price
0
250
35
250
400
30
400
550
25
550
650
15
650
9999
5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.
PSU
0
350
4
350
450
4
450
550
3
550
650
2
650
9999
1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.
Temp
0
70
2
70
75
2
75
80
1
80
85
1
85
999
1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.
Noise
0
45
2
45
48
2
48
50
2
50
55
1
55
999
1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.
FHD
60
9999
18
55
60
13
45
55
11
35
45
7
0
35
5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.
QHD
60
9999
10
55
60
8
45
55
5
35
45
4
0
35
2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.
F4K
60
9999
5
55
60
4
45
55
3
35
45
2
0
35
1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the
time this graphics card was released.
CPU
-5
9999
5
-7
-5
4
-10
-7
3
-15
-10
2
-9999
-15
1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future
demanding games.
MEM
8
9999
5
4
8
4
2
4
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
FROM
TO
VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.
OVERALL SCORE
80
99
Excellent
70
80
Very Good
60
70
Good
40
60
Acceptable
0
40
Weak
81/100
Excellent
Compared to its NVIDIA 's closest rival, GTX 970, the R9 290X was -1.6 % slower. For 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Overwatch 2, Spider-Man Remastered, Apex Legends, Call of Duty Modern Warfare, Resident Evil 2 at 60 fps to 71 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 66 fps.
For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play Valorant at 95 fps to 95 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 95 fps. For 2160p 4K, we were able to play Valorant at 83 fps to 83 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 83 fps.
The R9 290X sits between the GTX 970 and the R9 390, falling slower than GTX 970 by 1.2% and faster than R9 390 by 0.3%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. The R9 290X's performance in this game hovers around the 60fps mark. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the GTX 970. Against its rival - the GTX 970, the R9 290X is much slower.
The R9 290X sits between the GTX 1050 Ti and the GTX 680, falling slower than GTX 1050 Ti by 0.4% and faster than GTX 680 by 0%. It has below average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the GTX 1050 Ti. Against its rival - the GTX 970, the R9 290X is much slower.
The R9 290X sits between the GTX 970 and the R9 390, falling slower than GTX 970 by 1.2% and faster than R9 390 by 0.3%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. The R9 290X's performance in this game hovers around the 60fps mark. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the GTX 970. Against its rival - the GTX 970, the R9 290X is much slower.
The R9 290X sits between the R9 290 and the RX 470, falling slower than R9 290 by 4.7% and faster than RX 470 by 0%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Against its rival - the GTX 970, the R9 290X is much slower.
The R9 290X sits between the GTX 970 and the R9 390, falling slower than GTX 970 by 0.9% and faster than R9 390 by 0.4%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the GTX 970. Those who have a high refresh rate monitor will enjoy what R9 290X has to offer as it averages 141.11060355974 fps. Against its rival - the GTX 970, the R9 290X is much slower.
And now AMD is billing its new Radeon R9 290X as a ready-for-4K solution. Them’s fighting words, particularly with Ultra HD targeted as the next frontier in PC gaming. The technology is still ...
Conclusion The most important thing to say about the new Radeon R9 290X 4GB is that on the price performance scale it's a clear winner against Nvidia's GTX 780 3GB, at the time of writing.
The AMD Radeon R9 290X is the fastest single-GPU graphics card any sane person would buy. The poor GTX 780, at the moment, is some £50 more expensive and consistently performs slower in every ...
AMD Radeon R9 290X Reference Card. The Radeon R9 290X is roughly 11” long and two-slots wide, like the Radeon HD 7970, but there are a number of small enhancements on the 290X which should aid ...
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 v AMD Radeon R9 290X: Other Things to Consider . These high-end cards are both available with huge variations in price. Most of the GTX 980 cards available range between £ ...
At $549.99, the Radeon R9 290X is priced "high" by AMD's standards, as the company's high-end, single-GPU products are typically priced in the $399 to $549 range. However, its pricing could be appealing to those contemplating a $620 GTX 780 or, worse still, the $999 GTX TITAN.
What is most obvious about our testing of the AMD Radeon R9 290X running inside a Bit Fenix Prodigy is that the Prodigy provides plenty of airflow, even without positive air pressure from multiple ...
Power Consumption Idle and Multi-Monitor Loads. The Radeon R9 290X’s power consumption at idle is surprisingly high. Even though AMD makes a point of highlighting its ZeroCore Power feature ...
The AMD Radeon R9 290X ($549 list) graphics card is the company's answer to Nvidia's near-total domination of the high-end GPU market. It's the highest-performing GPU the company has ever launched ...
The new Radeon R9 295X2 is about 80-percent faster than a single-GPU Radeon R9 290X. On the upside, AMD doesn’t seem to be engaging in any price gouging for the R9 295X2.
Radeon R9 290X vs. GeForce Titan vs. GTX 780. In a sense, the Radeon R9 290X could be considered AMD's Titan, as it takes the Tahiti architecture and stuffs with nearly 2000 million more transistors.
AMD's reference Radeon R9 290 and 290X cooler earned our disdain once we figured out that it was causing the otherwise-impressive Hawaii GPU to operate at performance levels below the company's ...
The 290X is not only the fastest card in AMD’s 200 series lineup, but the 290 series in particular also contains the only new GPU in AMD’s latest generation of video cards.
AMD mentions that the new CrossFire technology for AMD Radeon R9 290X and Radeon R9n 290 is designed for AMD Eyefinity and UltraHD (4K) resolution setups. The new technology, as mentioned before ...
What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card
If you have been planning to upgrade your system by purchasing a new graphics card. Then there are some important factors to consider.
Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance
What affects game performance? Clarity or Details?
Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games
Every player has a different notion about the ideal setting for PC games. But in most cases, opting for a High quality graphics configuration is the way to go.
What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?
Are you getting sudden frame drops? you might have a bottleneck.
What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?
For some games, you can still enjoy great garphics at lower frame rates.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Discussion and Comments
Share Your Comments