i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - F1 2016 Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

F1 2016

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in F1 2016 using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.3 FPS
1080p
55.7 FPS
1440p
49.3 FPS
1440p
47.9 FPS
2160p
31.8 FPS
2160p
30.9 FPS
w1440p
43.4 FPS
w1440p
42.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.3 FPS
1080p
95.9 FPS
1440p
86.4 FPS
1440p
84.3 FPS
2160p
59.2 FPS
2160p
57.8 FPS
w1440p
77.4 FPS
w1440p
75.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.2 FPS
1080p
136.1 FPS
1440p
123.5 FPS
1440p
120.7 FPS
2160p
86.6 FPS
2160p
84.6 FPS
w1440p
111.5 FPS
w1440p
109.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
221.1 FPS
1080p
216.5 FPS
1440p
197.7 FPS
1440p
193.5 FPS
2160p
141.5 FPS
2160p
138.3 FPS
w1440p
179.6 FPS
w1440p
175.8 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments