i3-4160 vs i7-8700K - Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation Graphics 384SP Mobile - Přehledy výkonu hry


i3-4160 i7-8700K

Multi-Thread Performance

5054 Pts
15970 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2076 Pts
2703 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

i3-4160 vs i7-8700K v Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation pomocí Graphics 384SP Mobile - Porovnání výkonu CPU v nastaveních Ultra, High, Medium a Low Quality s rozlišením 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K

i3-4160 i7-8700K

Ultra kvalitní
Rozlišení Snímků za sekundu
1080p
24.5 FPS
1080p
43.6 FPS
1440p
20.6 FPS
1440p
36.7 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
2160p
29.7 FPS
w1440p
19.9 FPS
w1440p
35.5 FPS
Vysoce kvalitní
Rozlišení Snímků za sekundu
1080p
47.2 FPS
1080p
77.7 FPS
1440p
40.6 FPS
1440p
67.0 FPS
2160p
33.8 FPS
2160p
55.8 FPS
w1440p
39.4 FPS
w1440p
65.1 FPS
Střední kvalita
Rozlišení Snímků za sekundu
1080p
69.9 FPS
1080p
111.9 FPS
1440p
60.6 FPS
1440p
97.3 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
2160p
81.9 FPS
w1440p
58.9 FPS
w1440p
94.8 FPS
Nízká kvalita
Rozlišení Snímků za sekundu
1080p
115.4 FPS
1080p
180.2 FPS
1440p
100.6 FPS
1440p
158.0 FPS
2160p
85.0 FPS
2160p
134.1 FPS
w1440p
97.8 FPS
w1440p
154.0 FPS
i3-4160
  • i3-4160 je výkonnější a generuje méně tepla.
i7-8700K
  • i7-8700K má vyšší mezipaměť úrovně 3. To je užitečné v případě, že máte značné víceprocesové pracovní zatížení, mnoho výpočtově intenzivních simultánních procesů. Pravděpodobněji na serveru, méně na osobně používaném počítači pro interaktivní pracovní vytížení.
  • i7-8700K má více jader. Výhodou více jader je, že systém zvládne více vláken. Každé jádro může zpracovávat samostatný tok dat. Tato architektura výrazně zvyšuje výkon systému, ve kterém běží souběžné aplikace.
  • i7-8700K má více podprocesů. Větší programy jsou rozděleny na podprocesy (malé sekce) tak, aby je procesor mohl provádět současně a rychleji.
  • U některých her má procesor s vyšší rychlostí hodin nebo technický název IPC (instrukce na hodiny) lepší výsledky než ostatní procesory s vyšším počtem jader a nižší rychlostí jádra.
  • i7-8700K má vyšší turbo hodiny zvýšení. Turbo Boost je CPU funkce, která bude spouštět rychlost hodin CPU rychleji než jeho základní hodiny, pokud jsou přítomny určité podmínky. To umožní starší software, který běží na méně jader, lépe fungovat na novější hardware. Vzhledem k tomu, že hry jsou také software, lze je také použít.
  • i7-8700K má menší velikost procesu. Čím rychleji se může tranzistor zapínat a vypínat, tím rychleji může pracovat. A tranzistory, které zapínají a vypínají méně energie, jsou účinnější, snižují provozní výkon nebo „dynamickou spotřebu energie“, kterou vyžaduje procesor.

Compare i3-4160 vs i7-8700K specifications

i3-4160 vs i7-8700K Architecture

i3-4160 i7-8700K
CodenameHaswellCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Haswell)Core i7 (Coffee Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3DDR4
Part#unknownSR3QR
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedJul 2014Oct 2017

i3-4160 vs i7-8700K Cache

i3-4160 i7-8700K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L33MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-4160 vs i7-8700K Cores

i3-4160 i7-8700K
# of Cores26
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 4400UHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-4160 vs i7-8700K Features

i3-4160 i7-8700K
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

i3-4160 vs i7-8700K Performance

i3-4160 i7-8700K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier36.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP54 W95 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.7 GHz
Voltageunknownvariable

i3-4160 vs i7-8700K Physical

i3-4160 i7-8700K
Die Size177 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA12CFC-LGA1151
Process Size22 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1150Intel Socket 1151
Transistors1400 millionunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i3-4160 vs i7-8700K in more games


Diskuse a komentáře

Sdílejte své komentáře
G
gackedicing 8 years ago
i3-4160 + 1050 2gb and 8gb ramWill I be able to do some rendering with my setup? I'm planning to use Lumion or some other software that can do 3D visualization.
0 0
S
snakejax 8 years ago
Yes, you can render with any CPU and GPU if the software supports gpu acceleration. It may take quite a long time with an i3 depending on what you want to render.
0 0
Y
yardgone 11 years ago
i3 4160 vs haswell pentium g3240thinking about trading up to i3 4160 from haswell pentium..will i notice a difference..the i3 4160 is 100 bucks at microcenter....thanks
0 0
S
synthesisgem 11 years ago
i would go for i3 4160 . Faster at stock clocks . Furthermore 4 threads vs 2 threads .http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Pentium-G3240-vs-Intel-4160
0 0
O
outercompleted 10 years ago
Intel I3 4160 vs I5 4460 for the GTX960Hi, I have the GTX960 graphic card and I have a question. The 4160 costs 106€ and the 4460 costs 163€, that is a HUGE difference of prize. I saw lots of reviews and benchmarks, and I think they are very similar (sligthly better the I5 of corse), but I3 is newer and have similar power and lower consumition.The question is: with the GTX 960, it will be slowed performance due the 4160? If it is only 2 or 3 FPS, I would buy the I3.Thanks
0 0
K
kittzero 10 years ago
The i3 will be fine if you don't want to spend the extra cash for the i5. Online gaming on a busy server may favor the i5 a bit with its 4 cores/4 threads over the i3 with its 2 cares/4 threads. But single player differences will be much less noticeable. Here is a comparison of the Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-4670k. While not the same CPUs in your post, it should give you an idea of the difference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXPK9doyMLg
0 0
Y
yoisydiesel 10 years ago
i3 4160 for gaming 2 or 3 years?Hi, my budget is limited for a new gaming pc, is a dual core with hyperthreading i3 4160 paired with a ATI R9 280 capable to run games (720p or 900p) for 2 o 3 years until i can get an i5 or i7?Thanks and sorry for my english.
0 0
S
shapeoutline 10 years ago
It depends on the games you will play.In general, I think the i3-4160 is a very good choice.It has a total passmark rating of 5041, and a single thread rating of 2080.Most games, particularly sims, strategy and mmo types depend on the performance of the single master thread.For that the 2080 rating is excellent.The i5-4460 mentioned has a stronger total rating of 6639, but a slightly weaker single thread rating of 1952.The only time when a i5 will be better is when a game can make use of more than 3 threads, and few do.I might suggest looking at the i3-4170 with a single thread rating of 2138. I think the cost is not much more than for a i3-4160.
0 0
T
towelparsec 9 years ago
i3-4160 with an GTX 1060So I'm planning to upgrade my Asus GTX 750 TI to Zotac GTX 1060 6gb, I was just wondering will it bottleneck my i3-4160? I was thinking on upgrade my GPU 1st then work my way on i5-4690 on later months. Games planning to play: AAARise of Tomb RaiderBattlefield 1OverwatchDeus EX Mankind DividedPlaying on 1366x720 resolution though, and wondering if I can set it to high to ultra settings.
0 0
M
muscleacceptor 9 years ago
A 750 ti is not too bad for 720p, I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here. A 1060 will certainly perform better than a 750ti at 1080p, but you don't mention upgrading your display. If you could be a bit more specific about the kind of performance you're getting now and what you hope to achieve with a 1060 then you might get more helpful answers.edit: It occurs to me that some games' 'ultra' settings might require a certain amount of vram. Your 750 ti, with 2gb, might be unable to play at ultra for that reason. If that's the case, a less expensive 4gb card, like an RX 460 or 1050ti, might allow you to play at 720p ultra and not cost as much.
0 0