i3-12100 vs i3-3225 - The Witcher 3 R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-3225

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
4335 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1768 Pts

The Witcher 3

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 in The Witcher 3 using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-3225

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.9 FPS
1080p
36.1 FPS
1440p
54.0 FPS
1440p
28.6 FPS
2160p
34.2 FPS
2160p
18.2 FPS
w1440p
47.2 FPS
w1440p
25.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
116.4 FPS
1080p
66.1 FPS
1440p
93.4 FPS
1440p
54.0 FPS
2160p
63.1 FPS
2160p
36.4 FPS
w1440p
83.2 FPS
w1440p
48.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
162.9 FPS
1080p
96.1 FPS
1440p
132.8 FPS
1440p
79.4 FPS
2160p
91.9 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
w1440p
119.3 FPS
w1440p
71.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
255.9 FPS
1080p
156.0 FPS
1440p
211.6 FPS
1440p
130.3 FPS
2160p
149.6 FPS
2160p
91.1 FPS
w1440p
191.3 FPS
w1440p
117.2 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-3225
  • The i3-3225 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-3225 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-3225 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-3225
CodenameAlder Lake-SIvy Bridge
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Ivy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62SR0RF
Production StatusActiveunknown

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Cache

i3-12100 i3-3225
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Cores

i3-12100 i3-3225
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 4000
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Performance

i3-12100 i3-3225
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier33.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W55 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Physical

i3-12100 i3-3225
Die Size163 mm²118 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-3225 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments