i3-12100 vs i3-3225 - The Callisto Protocol R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-3225

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
4335 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1768 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 in The Callisto Protocol using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-3225

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.3 FPS
1080p
14.1 FPS
1440p
18.8 FPS
1440p
10.0 FPS
2160p
9.5 FPS
2160p
5.0 FPS
w1440p
15.1 FPS
w1440p
8.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.9 FPS
1080p
29.1 FPS
1440p
37.5 FPS
1440p
21.5 FPS
2160p
20.6 FPS
2160p
11.6 FPS
w1440p
30.9 FPS
w1440p
17.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.5 FPS
1080p
44.1 FPS
1440p
56.2 FPS
1440p
33.0 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
2160p
18.2 FPS
w1440p
46.8 FPS
w1440p
27.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
125.6 FPS
1080p
74.2 FPS
1440p
93.5 FPS
1440p
56.1 FPS
2160p
53.7 FPS
2160p
31.5 FPS
w1440p
78.4 FPS
w1440p
46.6 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-3225
  • The i3-3225 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-3225 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-3225 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-3225
CodenameAlder Lake-SIvy Bridge
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Ivy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62SR0RF
Production StatusActiveunknown

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Cache

i3-12100 i3-3225
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Cores

i3-12100 i3-3225
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 4000
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Performance

i3-12100 i3-3225
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier33.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W55 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-3225 Physical

i3-12100 i3-3225
Die Size163 mm²118 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-3225 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments