i9-10900K vs i3-4130 - The Last of Us Part I RX 6650M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-4130

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
4795 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1961 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i9-10900K vs i3-4130 in The Last of Us Part I using RX 6650M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-4130

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
37.0 FPS
1080p
18.6 FPS
1440p
28.1 FPS
1440p
14.1 FPS
2160p
14.8 FPS
2160p
7.4 FPS
w1440p
23.0 FPS
w1440p
11.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
67.5 FPS
1080p
37.1 FPS
1440p
53.2 FPS
1440p
29.1 FPS
2160p
30.4 FPS
2160p
16.5 FPS
w1440p
44.7 FPS
w1440p
24.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.0 FPS
1080p
55.7 FPS
1440p
78.3 FPS
1440p
44.1 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
2160p
25.6 FPS
w1440p
66.4 FPS
w1440p
37.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
159.0 FPS
1080p
92.7 FPS
1440p
128.5 FPS
1440p
74.2 FPS
2160p
77.2 FPS
2160p
43.7 FPS
w1440p
109.8 FPS
w1440p
62.9 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-4130
  • The i3-4130 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-4130 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-4130 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-4130
CodenameComet LakeHaswell
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSR1NP
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2013

i9-10900K vs i3-4130 Cache

i9-10900K i3-4130
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-4130 Cores

i9-10900K i3-4130
# of Cores102
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Intel HD 4400
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-4130 Features

i9-10900K i3-4130
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i9-10900K vs i3-4130 Notes

i9-10900K i3-4130

i9-10900K vs i3-4130 Performance

i9-10900K i3-4130
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier37.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W54 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i9-10900K vs i3-4130 Physical

i9-10900K i3-4130
Die Sizeunknown177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA12C
Process Size14 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1150
Transistorsunknown1400 million
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-4130 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments