i5-9600K vs i5-12400 - The Last of Us Part I GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-9600K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

13352 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2677 Pts
3240 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-9600K vs i5-12400 in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-9600K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.0 FPS
1080p
19.6 FPS
1440p
14.5 FPS
1440p
15.0 FPS
2160p
7.7 FPS
2160p
7.9 FPS
w1440p
11.9 FPS
w1440p
12.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
37.8 FPS
1080p
38.9 FPS
1440p
29.8 FPS
1440p
30.7 FPS
2160p
17.1 FPS
2160p
17.5 FPS
w1440p
25.1 FPS
w1440p
25.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.7 FPS
1080p
58.1 FPS
1440p
45.2 FPS
1440p
46.5 FPS
2160p
26.4 FPS
2160p
27.0 FPS
w1440p
38.3 FPS
w1440p
39.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
94.3 FPS
1080p
96.7 FPS
1440p
75.9 FPS
1440p
78.0 FPS
2160p
45.2 FPS
2160p
46.1 FPS
w1440p
64.6 FPS
w1440p
66.4 FPS
i5-9600K
  • The i5-9600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-9600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-9600K vs i5-12400 specifications

i5-9600K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i5-9600K i5-12400
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#SR3WZSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-9600K vs i5-12400 Cache

i5-9600K i5-12400
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L39MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i5-9600K vs i5-12400 Cores

i5-9600K i5-12400
# of Cores66
# of Threads612
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i5-9600K vs i5-12400 Features

i5-9600K i5-12400

i5-9600K vs i5-12400 Notes

i5-9600K i5-12400

i5-9600K vs i5-12400 Performance

i5-9600K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP95 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i5-9600K vs i5-12400 Physical

i5-9600K i5-12400
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i5-9600K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments