i5-13600K vs i3-8350K - The Last of Us Part I GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K i3-8350K

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
9251 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
2341 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-13600K vs i3-8350K in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K i3-8350K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.8 FPS
1080p
16.4 FPS
1440p
14.5 FPS
1440p
12.5 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
2160p
6.5 FPS
w1440p
11.8 FPS
w1440p
10.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
39.2 FPS
1080p
33.3 FPS
1440p
29.8 FPS
1440p
26.2 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
2160p
14.7 FPS
w1440p
24.9 FPS
w1440p
21.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.6 FPS
1080p
50.1 FPS
1440p
45.2 FPS
1440p
39.9 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
2160p
22.9 FPS
w1440p
38.0 FPS
w1440p
33.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
97.5 FPS
1080p
83.8 FPS
1440p
75.9 FPS
1440p
67.3 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
2160p
39.2 FPS
w1440p
64.2 FPS
w1440p
57.0 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-8350K
  • The i3-8350K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-8350K is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs i3-8350K specifications

i5-13600K vs i3-8350K Architecture

i5-13600K i3-8350K
CodenameRaptor Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Core i3 (Coffee Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRMBDSR3N4
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-13600K vs i3-8350K Cache

i5-13600K i3-8350K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L324MB (shared)8MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs i3-8350K Cores

i5-13600K i3-8350K
# of Cores144
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs i3-8350K Performance

i5-13600K i3-8350K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier35.0x40.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W91 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzN/A

i5-13600K vs i3-8350K Physical

i5-13600K i3-8350K
Die Size257 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-13600K vs i3-8350K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments