i5-10400 vs i7-11700K - The Last of Us Part I R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i7-11700K

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
19864 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
3140 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-10400 vs i7-11700K in The Last of Us Part I using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i7-11700K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.9 FPS
1080p
29.2 FPS
1440p
20.4 FPS
1440p
20.8 FPS
2160p
10.8 FPS
2160p
11.0 FPS
w1440p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
17.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
52.9 FPS
1080p
55.0 FPS
1440p
40.3 FPS
1440p
40.9 FPS
2160p
23.0 FPS
2160p
23.4 FPS
w1440p
33.8 FPS
w1440p
34.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
77.8 FPS
1080p
80.8 FPS
1440p
60.1 FPS
1440p
61.1 FPS
2160p
35.3 FPS
2160p
35.8 FPS
w1440p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
51.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
127.8 FPS
1080p
132.4 FPS
1440p
99.8 FPS
1440p
101.4 FPS
2160p
59.7 FPS
2160p
60.6 FPS
w1440p
85.0 FPS
w1440p
86.3 FPS
i5-10400
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i7-11700K
  • The i7-11700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-11700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-11700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i7-11700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-10400 vs i7-11700K specifications

i5-10400 vs i7-11700K Architecture

i5-10400 i7-11700K
CodenameComet LakeRocket Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i7 (Rocket Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Mar 16th, 2021

i5-10400 vs i7-11700K Cache

i5-10400 i7-11700K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i7-11700K Cores

i5-10400 i7-11700K
# of Cores68
# of Threads1216
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics 750
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i7-11700K Features

i5-10400 i7-11700K
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

i5-10400 vs i7-11700K Notes

i5-10400 i7-11700K
This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.This processor comes with an unlocked BCLK multiplier, allowing users to set the multiplier value higher than shipped value, to facilitate better overclocking.

i5-10400 vs i7-11700K Performance

i5-10400 i7-11700K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier29.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 5 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i5-10400 vs i7-11700K Physical

i5-10400 i7-11700K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i7-11700K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments