i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - The Last of Us Part I GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
23.6 FPS
1080p
22.3 FPS
1440p
17.9 FPS
1440p
17.0 FPS
2160p
9.4 FPS
2160p
8.9 FPS
w1440p
14.6 FPS
w1440p
13.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.7 FPS
1080p
43.5 FPS
1440p
35.9 FPS
1440p
34.3 FPS
2160p
20.4 FPS
2160p
19.4 FPS
w1440p
30.0 FPS
w1440p
28.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
67.8 FPS
1080p
64.7 FPS
1440p
53.9 FPS
1440p
51.6 FPS
2160p
31.3 FPS
2160p
29.9 FPS
w1440p
45.5 FPS
w1440p
43.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
112.0 FPS
1080p
107.1 FPS
1440p
89.9 FPS
1440p
86.3 FPS
2160p
53.3 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
76.3 FPS
w1440p
72.9 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments