i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 705e - The Last of Us Part I R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Phenom II X3 705e

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
2227 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
844 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 705e in The Last of Us Part I using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 705e

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.6 FPS
1080p
10.6 FPS
1440p
20.3 FPS
1440p
8.1 FPS
2160p
10.7 FPS
2160p
4.3 FPS
w1440p
16.6 FPS
w1440p
6.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
52.4 FPS
1080p
22.6 FPS
1440p
40.1 FPS
1440p
17.9 FPS
2160p
22.8 FPS
2160p
10.2 FPS
w1440p
33.6 FPS
w1440p
14.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
77.1 FPS
1080p
34.7 FPS
1440p
59.9 FPS
1440p
27.6 FPS
2160p
35.0 FPS
2160p
16.0 FPS
w1440p
50.6 FPS
w1440p
23.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
126.7 FPS
1080p
58.8 FPS
1440p
99.4 FPS
1440p
47.1 FPS
2160p
59.3 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
84.6 FPS
w1440p
39.7 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X3 705e
  • The Phenom II X3 705e has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 705e specifications

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 705e Architecture

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 705e
CodenameAlder Lake-SHeka
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X3 (Heka)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61HD705EOCK3DGIHD705EOCGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 705e Cache

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 705e
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 705e Cores

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 705e
# of Cores43
# of Threads83
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 705e Performance

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 705e
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier35.0x12.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 705e Physical

i3-12300 Phenom II X3 705e
Die Size163 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X3 705e in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments