i3-12300 vs i5-12600K - The Callisto Protocol GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i5-12600K

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
17640 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
3590 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-12300 vs i5-12600K in The Callisto Protocol using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i5-12600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
15.4 FPS
1080p
16.6 FPS
1440p
11.0 FPS
1440p
11.7 FPS
2160p
5.5 FPS
2160p
5.8 FPS
w1440p
8.8 FPS
w1440p
9.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
31.5 FPS
1080p
33.6 FPS
1440p
23.4 FPS
1440p
24.7 FPS
2160p
12.7 FPS
2160p
13.3 FPS
w1440p
19.2 FPS
w1440p
20.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.5 FPS
1080p
50.6 FPS
1440p
35.8 FPS
1440p
37.7 FPS
2160p
19.8 FPS
2160p
20.7 FPS
w1440p
29.6 FPS
w1440p
31.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
79.7 FPS
1080p
84.6 FPS
1440p
60.6 FPS
1440p
63.7 FPS
2160p
34.1 FPS
2160p
35.7 FPS
w1440p
50.5 FPS
w1440p
52.8 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-12600K
  • The i5-12600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-12600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-12600K specifications

i3-12300 vs i5-12600K Architecture

i3-12300 i5-12600K
CodenameAlder Lake-SAlder Lake
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRL61unknown
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 2022Nov 4th, 2021

i3-12300 vs i5-12600K Cache

i3-12300 i5-12600K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)9.5MB (shared)
Cache L312MB (shared)20MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i5-12600K Cores

i3-12300 i5-12600K
# of Cores410
# of Threads816
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i5-12600K Performance

i3-12300 i5-12600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier35.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.9 GHz

i3-12300 vs i5-12600K Physical

i3-12300 i5-12600K
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1700
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-12600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments