i3-12100 vs i5-3475S - The Callisto Protocol R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i5-3475S

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
6612 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1903 Pts

The Callisto Protocol

i3-12100 vs i5-3475S in The Callisto Protocol using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i5-3475S

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.3 FPS
1080p
21.0 FPS
1440p
18.8 FPS
1440p
14.9 FPS
2160p
9.5 FPS
2160p
7.5 FPS
w1440p
15.1 FPS
w1440p
12.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.9 FPS
1080p
41.3 FPS
1440p
37.5 FPS
1440p
30.6 FPS
2160p
20.6 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
30.9 FPS
w1440p
25.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.5 FPS
1080p
61.6 FPS
1440p
56.2 FPS
1440p
46.2 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
2160p
25.8 FPS
w1440p
46.8 FPS
w1440p
38.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
125.6 FPS
1080p
102.1 FPS
1440p
93.5 FPS
1440p
77.6 FPS
2160p
53.7 FPS
2160p
44.2 FPS
w1440p
78.4 FPS
w1440p
65.1 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-3475S
  • The i5-3475S has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-3475S has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-3475S specifications

i3-12100 vs i5-3475S Architecture

i3-12100 i5-3475S
CodenameAlder Lake-SIvy Bridge
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Ivy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62SR0PP
Production StatusActiveunknown

i3-12100 vs i5-3475S Cache

i3-12100 i5-3475S
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i5-3475S Cores

i3-12100 i5-3475S
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 4000
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i5-3475S Performance

i3-12100 i5-3475S
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier33.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 3.6 GHz

i3-12100 vs i5-3475S Physical

i3-12100 i5-3475S
Die Size163 mm²160 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155

Compare i3-12100 vs i5-3475S in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments