i9-12900K vs i3-10100 - Starfield Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
2531 Pts

Starfield

i9-12900K vs i3-10100 in Starfield using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
12.1 FPS
1080p
10.5 FPS
1440p
10.6 FPS
1440p
9.4 FPS
2160p
7.0 FPS
2160p
6.2 FPS
w1440p
9.4 FPS
w1440p
8.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
25.5 FPS
1080p
22.5 FPS
1440p
22.6 FPS
1440p
20.4 FPS
2160p
15.7 FPS
2160p
14.1 FPS
w1440p
20.4 FPS
w1440p
18.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.8 FPS
1080p
34.4 FPS
1440p
34.7 FPS
1440p
31.3 FPS
2160p
24.4 FPS
2160p
22.0 FPS
w1440p
31.3 FPS
w1440p
28.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
65.5 FPS
1080p
58.3 FPS
1440p
58.8 FPS
1440p
53.3 FPS
2160p
41.7 FPS
2160p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
53.3 FPS
w1440p
48.5 FPS
i9-12900K
    i3-10100
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-12900K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i9-12900K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i9-12900K i3-10100

    i9-12900K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i9-12900K i3-10100

    i9-12900K vs i3-10100 Cores

    i9-12900K i3-10100

    i9-12900K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i9-12900K i3-10100
    Frequency3.2 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-12900K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i9-12900K i3-10100

    Compare i9-12900K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments