i9-10900K vs i3-12300 - Starfield Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
3550 Pts

Starfield

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 in Starfield using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
14.6 FPS
1080p
14.0 FPS
1440p
13.1 FPS
1440p
12.5 FPS
2160p
8.8 FPS
2160p
8.4 FPS
w1440p
11.7 FPS
w1440p
11.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.0 FPS
1080p
28.9 FPS
1440p
27.3 FPS
1440p
26.2 FPS
2160p
19.2 FPS
2160p
18.4 FPS
w1440p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
23.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.5 FPS
1080p
43.9 FPS
1440p
41.5 FPS
1440p
39.9 FPS
2160p
29.6 FPS
2160p
28.5 FPS
w1440p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
36.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.3 FPS
1080p
73.8 FPS
1440p
69.9 FPS
1440p
67.3 FPS
2160p
50.5 FPS
2160p
48.5 FPS
w1440p
63.7 FPS
w1440p
61.5 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-12300 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-12300
CodenameComet LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL61
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Cache

i9-10900K i3-12300
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Cores

i9-10900K i3-12300
# of Cores104
# of Threads208
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Features

i9-10900K i3-12300

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Notes

i9-10900K i3-12300

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Performance

i9-10900K i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-10900K vs i3-12300 Physical

i9-10900K i3-12300
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments