i9-10900K vs i3-10300 - Starfield Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2690 Pts

Starfield

i9-10900K vs i3-10300 in Starfield using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
14.6 FPS
1080p
13.4 FPS
1440p
13.1 FPS
1440p
12.1 FPS
2160p
8.8 FPS
2160p
8.1 FPS
w1440p
11.7 FPS
w1440p
10.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.0 FPS
1080p
27.8 FPS
1440p
27.3 FPS
1440p
25.5 FPS
2160p
19.2 FPS
2160p
17.9 FPS
w1440p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
23.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.5 FPS
1080p
42.3 FPS
1440p
41.5 FPS
1440p
38.8 FPS
2160p
29.6 FPS
2160p
27.6 FPS
w1440p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
35.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.3 FPS
1080p
71.2 FPS
1440p
69.9 FPS
1440p
65.5 FPS
2160p
50.5 FPS
2160p
47.1 FPS
w1440p
63.7 FPS
w1440p
59.7 FPS
i9-10900K
    i3-10300
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10300 specifications

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Cache

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Cores

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Features

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Notes

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Performance

    i9-10900K i3-10300
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Physical

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments