i9-10900K vs i3-4160 - Resident Evil 2 RTX 3070 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-4160

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
5054 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2076 Pts

Resident Evil 2

i9-10900K vs i3-4160 in Resident Evil 2 using RTX 3070 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-4160

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
224.0 FPS
1080p
121.3 FPS
1440p
150.0 FPS
1440p
81.3 FPS
2160p
74.0 FPS
2160p
40.1 FPS
w1440p
119.8 FPS
w1440p
64.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
307.8 FPS
1080p
185.3 FPS
1440p
221.1 FPS
1440p
132.3 FPS
2160p
122.2 FPS
2160p
72.3 FPS
w1440p
183.4 FPS
w1440p
109.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
391.6 FPS
1080p
249.2 FPS
1440p
292.3 FPS
1440p
183.3 FPS
2160p
170.3 FPS
2160p
104.6 FPS
w1440p
246.9 FPS
w1440p
153.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
559.1 FPS
1080p
377.2 FPS
1440p
434.6 FPS
1440p
285.3 FPS
2160p
266.7 FPS
2160p
169.1 FPS
w1440p
374.0 FPS
w1440p
242.4 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-4160
  • The i3-4160 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-4160 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-4160 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-4160
CodenameComet LakeHaswell
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jul 2014

i9-10900K vs i3-4160 Cache

i9-10900K i3-4160
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-4160 Cores

i9-10900K i3-4160
# of Cores102
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Intel HD 4400
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-4160 Features

i9-10900K i3-4160
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3

i9-10900K vs i3-4160 Notes

i9-10900K i3-4160

i9-10900K vs i3-4160 Performance

i9-10900K i3-4160
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier37.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W54 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i9-10900K vs i3-4160 Physical

i9-10900K i3-4160
Die Sizeunknown177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA12C
Process Size14 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1150
Transistorsunknown1400 million
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-4160 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments