i3-10100 vs i5-10600K - Resident Evil 2 R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 i5-10600K

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
14000 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
2850 Pts

Resident Evil 2

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K in Resident Evil 2 using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 i5-10600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.9 FPS
1080p
94.2 FPS
1440p
59.2 FPS
1440p
60.9 FPS
2160p
29.1 FPS
2160p
29.9 FPS
w1440p
47.2 FPS
w1440p
48.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
141.3 FPS
1080p
149.8 FPS
1440p
101.0 FPS
1440p
103.5 FPS
2160p
54.8 FPS
2160p
56.1 FPS
w1440p
83.2 FPS
w1440p
85.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
194.8 FPS
1080p
205.5 FPS
1440p
142.9 FPS
1440p
146.1 FPS
2160p
80.6 FPS
2160p
82.4 FPS
w1440p
119.3 FPS
w1440p
122.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
301.6 FPS
1080p
316.7 FPS
1440p
226.5 FPS
1440p
231.3 FPS
2160p
132.0 FPS
2160p
134.8 FPS
w1440p
191.3 FPS
w1440p
195.6 FPS
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-10600K
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-10600K specifications

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K

i3-10100 i5-10600K

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K Compatibility

i3-10100 i5-10600K

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K General

i3-10100 i5-10600K

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K Integrated Graphics

i3-10100 i5-10600K

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K Memory Specs

i3-10100 i5-10600K

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K Performance

i3-10100 i5-10600K
Frequency3.60 GHz4.1 GHz
TDP65 W95 W

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K Technical Specs

i3-10100 i5-10600K

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K Technologies and Extensions

i3-10100 i5-10600K

i3-10100 vs i5-10600K Virtualization Technologies

i3-10100 i5-10600K

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-10600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments