i9-10900K vs i7-5960X - Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart RTX 3050 Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i7-5960X

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
15952 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1996 Pts

Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart

i9-10900K vs i7-5960X in Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart using RTX 3050 Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i7-5960X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
39.0 FPS
1080p
31.4 FPS
1440p
26.8 FPS
1440p
21.6 FPS
2160p
14.6 FPS
2160p
11.7 FPS
w1440p
22.1 FPS
w1440p
17.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.6 FPS
1080p
58.6 FPS
1440p
51.0 FPS
1440p
42.3 FPS
2160p
30.0 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
43.2 FPS
w1440p
35.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
102.3 FPS
1080p
85.7 FPS
1440p
75.3 FPS
1440p
63.0 FPS
2160p
45.5 FPS
2160p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
64.2 FPS
w1440p
53.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
165.5 FPS
1080p
140.1 FPS
1440p
123.8 FPS
1440p
104.4 FPS
2160p
76.3 FPS
2160p
63.7 FPS
w1440p
106.3 FPS
w1440p
89.5 FPS
i9-10900K
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i7-5960X
  • The i7-5960X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.

Compare i9-10900K vs i7-5960X specifications

i9-10900K vs i7-5960X Architecture

i9-10900K i7-5960X
CodenameComet LakeHaswell-E
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i7 (Haswell-E EE)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownSR20Q
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2014

i9-10900K vs i7-5960X Cache

i9-10900K i7-5960X
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)20MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i7-5960X Cores

i9-10900K i7-5960X
# of Cores108
# of Threads2016
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i7-5960X Features

i9-10900K i7-5960X
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

i9-10900K vs i7-5960X Notes

i9-10900K i7-5960X

i9-10900K vs i7-5960X Performance

i9-10900K i7-5960X
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W140 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 3.5 GHz
Voltagevariableunknown

i9-10900K vs i7-5960X Physical

i9-10900K i7-5960X
Die Sizeunknown356 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 2011-3
Transistorsunknown2600 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs i7-5960X in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments