i5-13600K vs i5-12400 - Rainbow Six Siege TITAN Xp - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
3240 Pts

Rainbow Six Siege

i5-13600K vs i5-12400 in Rainbow Six Siege using TITAN Xp - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
367.2 FPS
1080p
342.3 FPS
1440p
218.6 FPS
1440p
212.1 FPS
2160p
101.2 FPS
2160p
98.2 FPS
w1440p
171.1 FPS
w1440p
166.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
459.2 FPS
1080p
434.0 FPS
1440p
301.7 FPS
1440p
294.3 FPS
2160p
159.2 FPS
2160p
155.2 FPS
w1440p
246.6 FPS
w1440p
240.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
551.1 FPS
1080p
525.8 FPS
1440p
384.8 FPS
1440p
376.6 FPS
2160p
217.1 FPS
2160p
212.1 FPS
w1440p
322.1 FPS
w1440p
315.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
735.1 FPS
1080p
709.3 FPS
1440p
551.0 FPS
1440p
541.0 FPS
2160p
333.0 FPS
2160p
326.1 FPS
w1440p
473.2 FPS
w1440p
464.1 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs i5-12400 specifications

i5-13600K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i5-13600K i5-12400
ChipsetsZ690, Z790Z690, H670, B660, H610
CodenameRaptor Lake-SAlder Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed5600 MT/s4800 MT/s
ECC MemoryYesNo
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
Launch MSRP$319$199
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRMBDSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateSep 27th, 2022Jan 4th, 2022

i5-13600K vs i5-12400 Cache

i5-13600K i5-12400
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L324MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs i5-12400 Cores

i5-13600K i5-12400
# of Cores146
# of Threads2012
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs i5-12400 Performance

i5-13600K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier35.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
PL1181 W65W
PL2181 W117W
PL2 Tau LimitUnlimited28 seconds
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i5-13600K vs i5-12400 Physical

i5-13600K i5-12400
Die Size257 mm²163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i5-13600K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments