i3-10100 vs i5-12600K - Rainbow Six Siege RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 i5-12600K

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
17640 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
3590 Pts

Rainbow Six Siege

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K in Rainbow Six Siege using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 i5-12600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
322.7 FPS
1080p
369.6 FPS
1440p
211.6 FPS
1440p
237.6 FPS
2160p
101.0 FPS
2160p
113.5 FPS
w1440p
167.3 FPS
w1440p
187.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
413.9 FPS
1080p
461.6 FPS
1440p
293.8 FPS
1440p
323.0 FPS
2160p
158.9 FPS
2160p
175.2 FPS
w1440p
242.1 FPS
w1440p
266.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
505.2 FPS
1080p
553.5 FPS
1440p
375.9 FPS
1440p
408.3 FPS
2160p
216.8 FPS
2160p
237.0 FPS
w1440p
316.9 FPS
w1440p
344.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
687.7 FPS
1080p
737.5 FPS
1440p
540.2 FPS
1440p
579.1 FPS
2160p
332.6 FPS
2160p
360.5 FPS
w1440p
466.4 FPS
w1440p
501.9 FPS
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-12600K
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-12600K specifications

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K

i3-10100 i5-12600K

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K Compatibility

i3-10100 i5-12600K

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K General

i3-10100 i5-12600K

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K Integrated Graphics

i3-10100 i5-12600K

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K Memory Specs

i3-10100 i5-12600K

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K Performance

i3-10100 i5-12600K
Frequency3.60 GHz3.7 GHz
TDP65 W125 W

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K Technical Specs

i3-10100 i5-12600K

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K Technologies and Extensions

i3-10100 i5-12600K

i3-10100 vs i5-12600K Virtualization Technologies

i3-10100 i5-12600K

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-12600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments