i5-10400 vs i3-12100 - Overwatch 2 Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i3-12100

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
12603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
3340 Pts

Overwatch 2

i5-10400 vs i3-12100 in Overwatch 2 using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i3-12100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
54.6 FPS
1080p
53.6 FPS
1440p
46.9 FPS
1440p
46.1 FPS
2160p
35.4 FPS
2160p
34.8 FPS
w1440p
44.1 FPS
w1440p
43.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
94.3 FPS
1080p
92.8 FPS
1440p
82.8 FPS
1440p
81.6 FPS
2160p
65.0 FPS
2160p
64.0 FPS
w1440p
78.5 FPS
w1440p
77.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
134.0 FPS
1080p
132.0 FPS
1440p
118.7 FPS
1440p
117.0 FPS
2160p
94.5 FPS
2160p
93.2 FPS
w1440p
112.9 FPS
w1440p
111.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
213.4 FPS
1080p
210.4 FPS
1440p
190.4 FPS
1440p
187.9 FPS
2160p
153.7 FPS
2160p
151.7 FPS
w1440p
181.7 FPS
w1440p
179.2 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-12100 specifications

i5-10400 vs i3-12100 Architecture

i5-10400 i3-12100
CodenameComet LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL62
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-10400 vs i3-12100 Cache

i5-10400 i3-12100
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i3-12100 Cores

i5-10400 i3-12100
# of Cores64
# of Threads128
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i3-12100 Features

i5-10400 i3-12100

i5-10400 vs i3-12100 Notes

i5-10400 i3-12100

i5-10400 vs i3-12100 Performance

i5-10400 i3-12100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier29.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.3 GHz

i5-10400 vs i3-12100 Physical

i5-10400 i3-12100
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i5-10400 vs i3-12100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments