i9-10900K vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed R9 290X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed

i9-10900K vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed using R9 290X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.2 FPS
1080p
76.5 FPS
1440p
57.5 FPS
1440p
55.4 FPS
2160p
38.2 FPS
2160p
36.9 FPS
w1440p
51.2 FPS
w1440p
49.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
134.9 FPS
1080p
125.7 FPS
1440p
98.6 FPS
1440p
95.5 FPS
2160p
69.4 FPS
2160p
67.3 FPS
w1440p
89.2 FPS
w1440p
86.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
186.6 FPS
1080p
174.8 FPS
1440p
139.6 FPS
1440p
135.5 FPS
2160p
100.6 FPS
2160p
97.8 FPS
w1440p
127.3 FPS
w1440p
123.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
290.1 FPS
1080p
273.1 FPS
1440p
221.7 FPS
1440p
215.7 FPS
2160p
162.9 FPS
2160p
158.7 FPS
w1440p
203.4 FPS
w1440p
198.0 FPS
i9-10900K
    i3-10100
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Cores

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Features

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Notes

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i9-10900K i3-10100
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-10900K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i9-10900K i3-10100

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments