i5-12400 vs i5-13600K - Need For Speed GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 i5-13600K

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
4308 Pts

Need For Speed

i5-12400 vs i5-13600K in Need For Speed using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 i5-13600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.6 FPS
1080p
66.5 FPS
1440p
47.2 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
2160p
31.2 FPS
2160p
32.4 FPS
w1440p
41.9 FPS
w1440p
43.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
104.5 FPS
1080p
111.6 FPS
1440p
83.2 FPS
1440p
86.1 FPS
2160p
58.2 FPS
2160p
60.2 FPS
w1440p
75.1 FPS
w1440p
77.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
147.4 FPS
1080p
156.6 FPS
1440p
119.3 FPS
1440p
123.1 FPS
2160p
85.3 FPS
2160p
88.0 FPS
w1440p
108.4 FPS
w1440p
111.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
233.3 FPS
1080p
246.8 FPS
1440p
191.3 FPS
1440p
197.1 FPS
2160p
139.4 FPS
2160p
143.5 FPS
w1440p
174.8 FPS
w1440p
180.2 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i5-12400 vs i5-13600K specifications

i5-12400 vs i5-13600K Architecture

i5-12400 i5-13600K
ChipsetsZ690, H670, B660, H610Z690, Z790
CodenameAlder Lake-SRaptor Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed4800 MT/s5600 MT/s
ECC MemoryNoYes
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Raptor Lake)
Launch MSRP$199$319
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Part#SRL4V SRL5YSRMBD
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 4th, 2022Sep 27th, 2022

i5-12400 vs i5-13600K Cache

i5-12400 i5-13600K
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)24MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs i5-13600K Cores

i5-12400 i5-13600K
# of Cores614
# of Threads1220
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs i5-13600K Performance

i5-12400 i5-13600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier25.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
PL165W181 W
PL2117W181 W
PL2 Tau Limit28 secondsUnlimited
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.1 GHz

i5-12400 vs i5-13600K Physical

i5-12400 i5-13600K
Die Size163 mm²257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i5-12400 vs i5-13600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments