i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Need For Speed RX 5300M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Need For Speed

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Need For Speed using RX 5300M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.1 FPS
1080p
37.0 FPS
1440p
29.5 FPS
1440p
28.6 FPS
2160p
19.8 FPS
2160p
19.2 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
w1440p
25.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.2 FPS
1080p
67.5 FPS
1440p
55.5 FPS
1440p
54.0 FPS
2160p
39.2 FPS
2160p
38.2 FPS
w1440p
50.4 FPS
w1440p
49.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
100.3 FPS
1080p
98.0 FPS
1440p
81.5 FPS
1440p
79.4 FPS
2160p
58.6 FPS
2160p
57.1 FPS
w1440p
74.4 FPS
w1440p
72.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
162.6 FPS
1080p
159.0 FPS
1440p
133.4 FPS
1440p
130.3 FPS
2160p
97.5 FPS
2160p
95.1 FPS
w1440p
122.3 FPS
w1440p
119.4 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments