Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 980 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom II X3 705e

Multi-Thread Performance

3974 Pts
2227 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1196 Pts
844 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 980 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom II X3 705e

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.7 FPS
1080p
34.3 FPS
1440p
30.8 FPS
1440p
24.8 FPS
2160p
21.3 FPS
2160p
17.1 FPS
w1440p
27.9 FPS
w1440p
22.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.4 FPS
1080p
63.2 FPS
1440p
57.6 FPS
1440p
47.7 FPS
2160p
41.8 FPS
2160p
34.5 FPS
w1440p
52.9 FPS
w1440p
43.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
110.0 FPS
1080p
92.1 FPS
1440p
84.4 FPS
1440p
70.6 FPS
2160p
62.3 FPS
2160p
51.9 FPS
w1440p
77.8 FPS
w1440p
64.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
177.4 FPS
1080p
150.0 FPS
1440p
138.0 FPS
1440p
116.5 FPS
2160p
103.3 FPS
2160p
86.7 FPS
w1440p
127.8 FPS
w1440p
107.5 FPS
Core2 Quad Q9550
  • The Core2 Quad Q9550 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Core2 Quad Q9550 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
Phenom II X3 705e
  • The Phenom II X3 705e has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X3 705e is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e specifications

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e Architecture

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom II X3 705e
CodenameYorkfieldHeka
GenerationCore 2 Quad (Yorkfield)Phenom II X3 (Heka)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3
Part#SLAWQSLB8VHD705EOCK3DGIHD705EOCGIBOX
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ReleasedMar 2008Jun 2009

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e Cache

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom II X3 705e
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L212MB (shared)512K (per core)

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e Cores

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom II X3 705e
# of Cores43
# of Threads43
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e Features

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom II X3 705e
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4.1 EIST Intel 64 iAMT2 VT-x TXTMMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e Notes

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom II X3 705e

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e Performance

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom II X3 705e
Base Clock333 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.833 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier8.5x12.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP95 W65 W
Turbo ClockN/AN/A
Voltage1.11 V1.25 V

Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e Physical

Core2 Quad Q9550 Phenom II X3 705e
Die Size2x 107 mm²258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA6µPGA
Process Size45 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 775AMD Socket AM3
Transistors820 million758 million
tCaseMax71°Cunknown

Compare Core2 Quad Q9550 vs Phenom II X3 705e in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
M
metacarpalwham 9 years ago
Upgrading Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550I only have $175AUD ($135USD) and I'm a huge fan of video editing. I mainly use vegas pro and after fx but i love a little bit of counter strike global offensive in between. My q9550 is quite slow in pre-rendering and rendering projects and I'm using money I've gathered to upgrade. I cannot go over my budget because i simply don't have the money to spend Is the fx6300 a good option or is there something better i could get within my price range? I'm currently using a GTX 650 ti (old i know ahah) but am hopefully getting a GTX msi 950 2gb gaming edition for christmas this year. I have 12 gigs ram, and motherboard will be decided when I find a suitable cpuThanks Ryan
0 0
S
shirleyglazing 9 years ago
When it comes to video editing, it is recommended to use an i7 Processor at minimum, but as you are on a limited budget, then that cannot happen (Unless you wait longer) and you'll need to get a new motherboard as well, as the LGA775 isn't widely used anymore. And to get a decent AMD CPU, or Intel CPU, that will allow somewhat alright rendering, it would be much over your budget.For example:PCPartPicker part list: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/Z8TBmGPrice breakdown by merchant: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/Z8TBmG/by_merchant/CPU: AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz 6-Core Processor ($153.00 @ Centre Com) Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 Micro ATX AM3+ Motherboard ($89.00 @ Umart) Total: $242.00Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when availableGenerated by PCPartPicker 2016-09-08 20:06 AEST+1000Or PCPartPicker part list: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/QrXNWZPrice breakdown by merchant: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/QrXNWZ/by_merchant/CPU: AMD A8-7600 3.1GHz Quad-Core Processor ($106.99 @ Mwave Australia) Motherboard: MSI A58M-E35 Micro ATX FM2+ Motherboard ($69.00 @ CPL Online) Total: $175.99Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when availableGenerated by PCPartPicker 2016-09-08 20:08 AEST+1000No promises on these being good, but they will be good to play games, but they will be slower when rendering, and may be a little unstable. But you wont be able to get a decent CPU for that price that will render flawlessly.You could always get an i3 with Hyperthreading:PCPartPicker part list: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/yznhFTPrice breakdown by merchant: http://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/yznhFT/by_merchant/CPU: Intel Core i3-4160 3.6GHz Dual-Core Processor ($109.00 @ Storm Computers) Motherboard: ASRock H81M-HDS Micro ATX LGA1150 Motherboard ($68.00 @ CPL Online) Total: $177.00Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when availableGenerated by PCPartPicker 2016-09-08 20:09 AEST+1000This would probably be much more stable, and it is a really good, cheap Intel CPU.
0 0
S
sistonalumni 11 years ago
CPU not overclocking (Core 2 Quad Q9550)I am trying to overclock my Intel core 2 quad q9550 cpu from 2.8 to 3.4 GHz but im failing at it.I have read many guides and what not and also the overclocking manual of the cpu but every time i try to overclock my computer reboots and goes back to default clock speed. I have also tried diffrent clock speeds and voltages for my cpu but the same thing happens. Any ideas what to do?
0 0
S
seventeeninternet 11 years ago
Oh well, that motherboard will be pretty bad for overclocking that chip. Look at trying to overclock to 350Mhz fsb my exerience with a similar board a g31-es2l which had fsb limits of around 360Mhz and the two boards are virtually the same excet for ram support. This really sucks for you due to the chip already running a default fsb of 333Mhz.
0 0
M
mercifultuesday 11 years ago
need help: core 2 quad q9550 OCsup quays??i want to overclock my cpu from 2.83to 3.40 i need the best bios option especially the cpu and ram vcoreand i would to know witch option should change??and what about the pcie??my motherboard: gigabyte ep45-ds4pi have : 8gb ram 4 peices
0 0
T
tactiletheme 11 years ago
Older CPUs are OCd only by altering the BUS. So, the first option in BIOS is to desable "Spread spectrum" so it wont affect the other components. RAM speed is going to be affectet alltough... so, you need to play with the ram ratio aswell (lower it). Then start increasing the bus, i say untill you get 3,2 GHz, run stress tests, monitor temps etc, then rais a bit more to 3,3 - 3,4. Dont alter the core voltage, i think you are fine with default.
0 0
B
barbonboxy 10 years ago
Good Core 2 Quad Q9550 Upgrade?Okay, so I have asked this question about 1 year ago but I haven't upgraded since then. This is the year I am positive about upgrading from my Q9550 as their are bottlenecks in games. Frames drop from 50 to 20 or 30. I gave a GTX 760 @ 2GB and it's a good GPU but my CPU is bringing it down. I have been thinking about this upgrade for a year now and I was positive to upgrade to core i5/i7 but somehow my mind changed and I suddenly want to upgrade to FX-8350. I know it's late and it's been 2.5 years since launch but it seems like bang for my buck. Will I notice any differences between the FX-8350 and my Q9550? Will it be a good upgrade? Or is the Intel core i5 4690k/i7 4790k much better and worth the extra $50-100. BTW, I live in Canada so prices here are higher and deals are much lower. The i7-4790k is $400 while the i5 is $300. Tax in ontario is %13 so it adds up. Is that $100-$200 Intel more worth it than the FX or not? No budget, just want to know if the FX is worth it and the extra money for Intel isn't.
0 0
P
pedometeraustin 10 years ago
I'd agree with InvalidError, either will be a performance improvement but the i5 would be better than the 8350. As far as prices being higher in canada they're really not when you factor the conversion rate. For instance a 4690k is listed as $270 canadian dollars, or $222 usd. It balances out. I'm not certain of tax but even the highest end i5 right now is $270 free shipping from newegg canada. Not sure where you're planning to buy it for $300. The 8350 is $210 from ncixus so it's a $60 canadian difference ($50 usd difference) not $200.It's up to you whether you think it's worth it or not. With skylake coming up toward the end of the year it may be worthwhile waiting for it. Even amd is supposed to have something early 2016 rather than buying into an amd platform that hasn't changed much the past 4yrs. You'd be buying into the tail end of it on it's way out going to the 8350 now. Skylake is rumored to have possibly ddr3 and ddr4 compatibility. Unless you're using ddr3 now (most likely ddr2) if you have to upgrade your ram anyway it may be worth skipping ddr3 at this point and going with ddr4 so you're not buying into ram that's starting to be fazed out.I went with the i5 as well and have been really happy with it coming from a core 2 duo. I also made the transition 5mo ago though, had I waited til now I might have just waited for skylake. Even going with the current i5 I'm sure it'll last me a good 4yrs or more. My e8400 lasted me a good 6yrs.
0 0
F
favouritedisband 9 years ago
Overclocking Failed !Greetings everyone,Im trying to overclock my Q9550 with google's help since i don't know how to do itand something is failing my overclock i believe its either that my ram is getting overclocked to high or my voltages are to low and i dont know how to either properly increase volts or stop clocking my ram seperate by my cpu here are some picsMobo: p5kpl/1600RAM: 667hzI would really appreciate any help
0 0
O
onlookerbolham 9 years ago
If you set your ram to 667 speed manually it shouldn't scale like that.
0 0