i9-13900K vs i9-12900K - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q with Intel Core i9-13900K

Need For Speed: Payback

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q with Intel Core i9-12900K

i9-13900K i9-12900K

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts

28791 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts

3903 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-13900K vs i9-12900K in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i9-12900K

Ultra Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	62.8 FPS
1080p	60.5 FPS
1440p	43.3 FPS
1440p	42.6 FPS
2160p	29.5 FPS
2160p	29.1 FPS
w1440p	38.9 FPS
w1440p	38.3 FPS

High Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	106.3 FPS
1080p	102.9 FPS
1440p	77.3 FPS
1440p	76.2 FPS
2160p	55.5 FPS
2160p	54.8 FPS
w1440p	70.5 FPS
w1440p	69.5 FPS

Medium Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	149.7 FPS
1080p	145.4 FPS
1440p	111.3 FPS
1440p	109.8 FPS
2160p	81.5 FPS
2160p	80.6 FPS
w1440p	102.0 FPS
w1440p	100.8 FPS

Low Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	236.6 FPS
1080p	230.2 FPS
1440p	179.2 FPS
1440p	177.0 FPS
2160p	133.4 FPS
2160p	132.0 FPS
w1440p	165.2 FPS
w1440p	163.2 FPS

i9-13900K

The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

i9-12900K

The i9-12900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i9-13900K vs i9-12900K specifications

i9-13900K vs i9-12900K Architecture

	i9-13900K	i9-12900K
Codename	Raptor Lake-S	Alder Lake
ECC Memory	Yes	No
Generation	Core i9 (Raptor Lake)	Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)
Market	Desktop	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel	DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
PCI-Express	Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)	Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#	SRMBH	unknown
Production Status	Active	Active
Release Date	Sep 27th, 2022	Nov 4th, 2021

i9-13900K vs i9-12900K Cache

	i9-13900K	i9-12900K
Cache L1	80K (per core)	64K (per core)
Cache L2	2MB (per core)	14MB (shared)
Cache L3	36MB (shared)	30MB (shared)

i9-13900K vs i9-12900K Cores

	i9-13900K	i9-12900K
# of Cores	24	16
# of Threads	32	24
Integrated Graphics	UHD Graphics 770	UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs	1	1

i9-13900K vs i9-12900K Performance

	i9-13900K	i9-12900K
Base Clock	100 MHz	100 MHz
Frequency	3 GHz	3.2 GHz
Multiplier	30.0x	32.0x
Multiplier Unlocked	Yes	Yes
TDP	125 W	125 W
Turbo Clock	up to 5.8 GHz	up to 5.2 GHz

i9-13900K vs i9-12900K Physical

	i9-13900K	i9-12900K
Die Size	257 mm²	unknown
Foundry	Intel	Intel
Package	FC-LGA16A	FC-LGA1700
Process Size	10 nm	10 nm
Socket	Intel Socket 1700	Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax	72°C	72°C
tJMax	100°C	100°C