i9-12900K vs i3-12300 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
3550 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
60.5 FPS
1080p
55.6 FPS
1440p
42.6 FPS
1440p
40.1 FPS
2160p
29.1 FPS
2160p
27.4 FPS
w1440p
38.3 FPS
w1440p
36.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
102.9 FPS
1080p
95.8 FPS
1440p
76.2 FPS
1440p
72.3 FPS
2160p
54.8 FPS
2160p
52.0 FPS
w1440p
69.5 FPS
w1440p
66.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
145.4 FPS
1080p
135.9 FPS
1440p
109.8 FPS
1440p
104.6 FPS
2160p
80.6 FPS
2160p
76.7 FPS
w1440p
100.8 FPS
w1440p
96.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
230.2 FPS
1080p
216.3 FPS
1440p
177.0 FPS
1440p
169.1 FPS
2160p
132.0 FPS
2160p
126.0 FPS
w1440p
163.2 FPS
w1440p
156.0 FPS
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
i3-12300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-12900K vs i3-12300 specifications

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Architecture

i9-12900K i3-12300
CodenameAlder LakeAlder Lake-S
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i9 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#unknownSRL61
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateNov 4th, 2021Jan 2022

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Cache

i9-12900K i3-12300
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L214MB (shared)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L330MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Cores

i9-12900K i3-12300
# of Cores164
# of Threads248
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Performance

i9-12900K i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier32.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.2 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-12900K vs i3-12300 Physical

i9-12900K i3-12300
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1700FC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i9-12900K vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments