i9-10900K vs i9-14900K - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 2050 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i9-14900K

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
41458 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
5619 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-10900K vs i9-14900K in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 2050 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i9-14900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
90.7 FPS
1440p
57.3 FPS
1440p
59.3 FPS
2160p
39.7 FPS
2160p
41.1 FPS
w1440p
51.9 FPS
w1440p
53.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
135.1 FPS
1080p
145.1 FPS
1440p
98.3 FPS
1440p
101.2 FPS
2160p
71.7 FPS
2160p
73.9 FPS
w1440p
90.3 FPS
w1440p
93.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
186.8 FPS
1080p
199.5 FPS
1440p
139.2 FPS
1440p
143.1 FPS
2160p
103.7 FPS
2160p
106.7 FPS
w1440p
128.7 FPS
w1440p
132.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
290.3 FPS
1080p
308.4 FPS
1440p
221.1 FPS
1440p
226.8 FPS
2160p
167.8 FPS
2160p
172.3 FPS
w1440p
205.4 FPS
w1440p
210.7 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-14900K
  • The i9-14900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-14900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i9-14900K specifications

i9-10900K vs i9-14900K Architecture

i9-10900K i9-14900K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i9-10900K vs i9-14900K Cache

i9-10900K i9-14900K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)36 MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i9-14900K Cores

i9-10900K i9-14900K

i9-10900K vs i9-14900K Features

i9-10900K i9-14900K

i9-10900K vs i9-14900K Notes

i9-10900K i9-14900K

i9-10900K vs i9-14900K Performance

i9-10900K i9-14900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier37.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 6 GHz

i9-10900K vs i9-14900K Physical

i9-10900K i9-14900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i9-10900K vs i9-14900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments