i9-10900K vs i3-10300 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2690 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-10900K vs i3-10300 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.1 FPS
1080p
53.5 FPS
1440p
41.9 FPS
1440p
38.6 FPS
2160p
28.6 FPS
2160p
26.3 FPS
w1440p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
34.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.4 FPS
1080p
92.7 FPS
1440p
75.1 FPS
1440p
70.0 FPS
2160p
54.0 FPS
2160p
50.2 FPS
w1440p
68.6 FPS
w1440p
63.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
140.8 FPS
1080p
131.8 FPS
1440p
108.4 FPS
1440p
101.4 FPS
2160p
79.4 FPS
2160p
74.1 FPS
w1440p
99.5 FPS
w1440p
93.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
223.4 FPS
1080p
210.2 FPS
1440p
174.8 FPS
1440p
164.2 FPS
2160p
130.3 FPS
2160p
122.0 FPS
w1440p
161.3 FPS
w1440p
151.3 FPS
i9-10900K
    i3-10300
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10300 specifications

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Cache

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Cores

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Features

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Notes

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Performance

    i9-10900K i3-10300
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Physical

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments