i9-10900K vs i3-10300 - Dead Space GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2690 Pts

Dead Space

i9-10900K vs i3-10300 in Dead Space using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
26.9 FPS
1080p
24.8 FPS
1440p
17.9 FPS
1440p
16.5 FPS
2160p
7.2 FPS
2160p
6.6 FPS
w1440p
13.4 FPS
w1440p
12.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.2 FPS
1080p
47.7 FPS
1440p
35.9 FPS
1440p
33.4 FPS
2160p
16.1 FPS
2160p
14.9 FPS
w1440p
27.8 FPS
w1440p
26.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
75.5 FPS
1080p
70.6 FPS
1440p
53.9 FPS
1440p
50.4 FPS
2160p
25.0 FPS
2160p
23.2 FPS
w1440p
42.3 FPS
w1440p
39.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
124.2 FPS
1080p
116.5 FPS
1440p
89.9 FPS
1440p
84.2 FPS
2160p
42.7 FPS
2160p
39.7 FPS
w1440p
71.2 FPS
w1440p
66.8 FPS
i9-10900K
    i3-10300
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10300 specifications

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Cache

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Cores

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Features

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Notes

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Performance

    i9-10900K i3-10300
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Physical

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments