i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Athlon II X3 460

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
2857 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1169 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 460

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
74.8 FPS
1080p
33.6 FPS
1440p
54.0 FPS
1440p
24.2 FPS
2160p
37.7 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
w1440p
49.1 FPS
w1440p
22.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
123.3 FPS
1080p
62.1 FPS
1440p
93.4 FPS
1440p
46.7 FPS
2160p
68.6 FPS
2160p
34.1 FPS
w1440p
86.1 FPS
w1440p
43.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
171.8 FPS
1080p
90.6 FPS
1440p
132.8 FPS
1440p
69.2 FPS
2160p
99.5 FPS
2160p
51.4 FPS
w1440p
123.1 FPS
w1440p
64.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
268.8 FPS
1080p
147.6 FPS
1440p
211.6 FPS
1440p
114.3 FPS
2160p
161.3 FPS
2160p
85.9 FPS
w1440p
197.1 FPS
w1440p
106.0 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 460
  • The Athlon II X3 460 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 specifications

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 Architecture

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 460
CodenameComet LakeRana
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX460WFK32GMADX460WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020May 2011

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 Cache

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 460
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 Cores

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 460
# of Cores103
# of Threads203
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 Features

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 460
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 Notes

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 460

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 Performance

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 460
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier37.0x17.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.4 V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 Physical

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 460
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 460 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments