i3-7320 vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-7320 vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
44.3 FPS
1080p
52.4 FPS
1440p
32.0 FPS
1440p
37.8 FPS
2160p
21.8 FPS
2160p
25.8 FPS
w1440p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
34.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.8 FPS
1080p
91.0 FPS
1440p
59.5 FPS
1440p
68.8 FPS
2160p
42.7 FPS
2160p
49.4 FPS
w1440p
54.3 FPS
w1440p
62.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.3 FPS
1080p
129.7 FPS
1440p
87.1 FPS
1440p
99.7 FPS
2160p
63.5 FPS
2160p
73.0 FPS
w1440p
79.9 FPS
w1440p
91.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
182.4 FPS
1080p
206.9 FPS
1440p
142.1 FPS
1440p
161.6 FPS
2160p
105.2 FPS
2160p
120.2 FPS
w1440p
131.0 FPS
w1440p
149.0 FPS
i3-7320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-10100 specifications

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Cache

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Cores

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Features

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Performance

    i3-7320 i3-10100
    Frequency4.1 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP51 W65 W

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Physical

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments