i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 FX-9370 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
9469 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
1611 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 FX-9370 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
44.3 FPS
1080p
35.1 FPS
1440p
32.0 FPS
1440p
25.3 FPS
2160p
21.8 FPS
2160p
17.3 FPS
w1440p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
22.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.8 FPS
1080p
64.5 FPS
1440p
59.5 FPS
1440p
48.6 FPS
2160p
42.7 FPS
2160p
34.8 FPS
w1440p
54.3 FPS
w1440p
44.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.3 FPS
1080p
93.9 FPS
1440p
87.1 FPS
1440p
71.8 FPS
2160p
63.5 FPS
2160p
52.4 FPS
w1440p
79.9 FPS
w1440p
65.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
182.4 FPS
1080p
152.7 FPS
1440p
142.1 FPS
1440p
118.3 FPS
2160p
105.2 FPS
2160p
87.5 FPS
w1440p
131.0 FPS
w1440p
109.0 FPS
i3-7320
    FX-9370 Eight-Core

      Compare i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core specifications

      i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core Architecture

      i3-7320 FX-9370 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core Cache

      i3-7320 FX-9370 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core Cores

      i3-7320 FX-9370 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core Features

      i3-7320 FX-9370 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core Performance

      i3-7320 FX-9370 Eight-Core

      i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core Physical

      i3-7320 FX-9370 Eight-Core

      Compare i3-7320 vs FX-9370 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments