i3-12100 vs i3-530 - Need For Speed: Payback RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-530

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
2568 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1113 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs i3-530 in Need For Speed: Payback using RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-530

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
179.8 FPS
1080p
45.5 FPS
1440p
132.0 FPS
1440p
33.4 FPS
2160p
92.9 FPS
2160p
23.5 FPS
w1440p
120.3 FPS
w1440p
30.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
256.9 FPS
1080p
80.6 FPS
1440p
198.8 FPS
1440p
61.8 FPS
2160p
148.1 FPS
2160p
45.5 FPS
w1440p
184.0 FPS
w1440p
56.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
334.1 FPS
1080p
115.8 FPS
1440p
265.6 FPS
1440p
90.2 FPS
2160p
203.3 FPS
2160p
67.6 FPS
w1440p
247.7 FPS
w1440p
83.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
488.3 FPS
1080p
186.1 FPS
1440p
399.3 FPS
1440p
146.9 FPS
2160p
313.7 FPS
2160p
111.6 FPS
w1440p
375.1 FPS
w1440p
136.6 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-530
  • The i3-530 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-530 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-530 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-530
CodenameAlder Lake-SClarkdale
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Clarkdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62SLBX7SLBLR
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs i3-530 Cache

i3-12100 i3-530
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-530 Cores

i3-12100 i3-530
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-530 Performance

i3-12100 i3-530
Base Clock100 MHz133 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz2.933 GHz
Multiplier33.0x22.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W73 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-530 Physical

i3-12100 i3-530
Die Size163 mm²81 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA10
Process Size10 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1156

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-530 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments