i3-12100 vs i3-2102 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-2102

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
3736 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1623 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-2102

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
86.8 FPS
1080p
41.3 FPS
1440p
61.0 FPS
1440p
29.8 FPS
2160p
42.3 FPS
2160p
20.6 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
27.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.8 FPS
1080p
74.2 FPS
1440p
103.7 FPS
1440p
56.0 FPS
2160p
75.7 FPS
2160p
40.6 FPS
w1440p
95.2 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
192.9 FPS
1080p
107.1 FPS
1440p
146.3 FPS
1440p
82.1 FPS
2160p
109.2 FPS
2160p
60.6 FPS
w1440p
135.2 FPS
w1440p
75.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
299.0 FPS
1080p
172.9 FPS
1440p
231.6 FPS
1440p
134.5 FPS
2160p
176.1 FPS
2160p
100.6 FPS
w1440p
215.1 FPS
w1440p
124.5 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-2102
  • The i3-2102 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-2102 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-2102
CodenameAlder Lake-SSandy Bridge
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Sandy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62SR05D
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Cache

i3-12100 i3-2102
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Cores

i3-12100 i3-2102
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 3000
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Performance

i3-12100 i3-2102
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier33.0x31.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-2102 Physical

i3-12100 i3-2102
Die Size163 mm²131 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA10
Process Size10 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1155

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-2102 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments