i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Need For Speed: Payback RX 460 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Need For Speed: Payback using RX 460 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
28.2 FPS
1080p
27.5 FPS
1440p
19.6 FPS
1440p
19.4 FPS
2160p
13.4 FPS
2160p
13.3 FPS
w1440p
17.7 FPS
w1440p
17.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
53.4 FPS
1080p
52.2 FPS
1440p
38.9 FPS
1440p
38.5 FPS
2160p
27.8 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
35.6 FPS
w1440p
35.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.5 FPS
1080p
76.9 FPS
1440p
58.1 FPS
1440p
57.6 FPS
2160p
42.3 FPS
2160p
42.0 FPS
w1440p
53.4 FPS
w1440p
52.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
128.8 FPS
1080p
126.3 FPS
1440p
96.7 FPS
1440p
95.9 FPS
2160p
71.2 FPS
2160p
70.8 FPS
w1440p
89.1 FPS
w1440p
88.3 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments