i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator RX 460 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RX 460 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
10.5 FPS
1080p
10.2 FPS
1440p
8.8 FPS
1440p
8.7 FPS
2160p
6.9 FPS
2160p
6.9 FPS
w1440p
8.4 FPS
w1440p
8.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
22.5 FPS
1080p
21.9 FPS
1440p
19.2 FPS
1440p
19.0 FPS
2160p
15.5 FPS
2160p
15.5 FPS
w1440p
18.4 FPS
w1440p
18.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
34.4 FPS
1080p
33.6 FPS
1440p
29.6 FPS
1440p
29.3 FPS
2160p
24.1 FPS
2160p
24.1 FPS
w1440p
28.5 FPS
w1440p
28.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.3 FPS
1080p
57.0 FPS
1440p
50.5 FPS
1440p
50.0 FPS
2160p
41.2 FPS
2160p
41.2 FPS
w1440p
48.5 FPS
w1440p
48.1 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments