i9-13900K vs i3-12100 - Need For Speed: Heat Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i3-12100

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
12603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
3340 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i9-13900K vs i3-12100 in Need For Speed: Heat using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i3-12100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.8 FPS
1080p
37.5 FPS
1440p
32.2 FPS
1440p
29.6 FPS
2160p
19.8 FPS
2160p
18.2 FPS
w1440p
27.8 FPS
w1440p
25.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.5 FPS
1080p
68.3 FPS
1440p
59.9 FPS
1440p
55.6 FPS
2160p
39.2 FPS
2160p
36.4 FPS
w1440p
52.7 FPS
w1440p
49.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
110.2 FPS
1080p
99.1 FPS
1440p
87.5 FPS
1440p
81.7 FPS
2160p
58.6 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
w1440p
77.6 FPS
w1440p
72.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
177.7 FPS
1080p
160.6 FPS
1440p
142.8 FPS
1440p
133.8 FPS
2160p
97.5 FPS
2160p
91.1 FPS
w1440p
127.4 FPS
w1440p
119.4 FPS
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
i3-12100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-13900K vs i3-12100 specifications

i9-13900K vs i3-12100 Architecture

i9-13900K i3-12100
ChipsetsZ690, Z790Z690, H670, B660, H610
CodenameRaptor Lake-SAlder Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed5600 MT/s4800 MT/s
ECC MemoryYesNo
GenerationCore i9 (Raptor Lake)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
Launch MSRP$589$122
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRMBHSRL62
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateSep 27th, 2022Jan 4th, 2022

i9-13900K vs i3-12100 Cache

i9-13900K i3-12100
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L336MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i9-13900K vs i3-12100 Cores

i9-13900K i3-12100
# of Cores244
# of Threads328
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-13900K vs i3-12100 Performance

i9-13900K i3-12100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier30.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
PL1253 W60W
PL2253 W89W
PL2 Tau LimitUnlimited28 seconds
TDP125 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.8 GHzup to 4.3 GHz

i9-13900K vs i3-12100 Physical

i9-13900K i3-12100
Die Size257 mm²163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i9-13900K vs i3-12100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments