i9-10900K vs i9-13900K - Need For Speed: Heat Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i9-13900K

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
34549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
4683 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K in Need For Speed: Heat using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i9-13900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
64.4 FPS
1080p
69.6 FPS
1440p
50.7 FPS
1440p
52.3 FPS
2160p
31.2 FPS
2160p
32.2 FPS
w1440p
43.8 FPS
w1440p
45.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
108.6 FPS
1080p
116.0 FPS
1440p
88.5 FPS
1440p
90.9 FPS
2160p
58.2 FPS
2160p
59.9 FPS
w1440p
78.1 FPS
w1440p
80.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
152.7 FPS
1080p
162.3 FPS
1440p
126.3 FPS
1440p
129.5 FPS
2160p
85.3 FPS
2160p
87.5 FPS
w1440p
112.3 FPS
w1440p
115.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
241.0 FPS
1080p
255.1 FPS
1440p
201.9 FPS
1440p
206.6 FPS
2160p
139.4 FPS
2160p
142.8 FPS
w1440p
180.8 FPS
w1440p
185.2 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-13900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i9-13900K specifications

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Architecture

i9-10900K i9-13900K
CodenameComet LakeRaptor Lake-S
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i9 (Raptor Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRMBH
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Cache

i9-10900K i9-13900K
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)36MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Cores

i9-10900K i9-13900K
# of Cores1024
# of Threads2032
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Features

i9-10900K i9-13900K

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Notes

i9-10900K i9-13900K

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Performance

i9-10900K i9-13900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 5.8 GHz

i9-10900K vs i9-13900K Physical

i9-10900K i9-13900K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i9-10900K vs i9-13900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments