i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 - Need For Speed: Heat RTX 2050 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Ryzen 3 3100

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
13425 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2468 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 in Need For Speed: Heat using RTX 2050 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Ryzen 3 3100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.9 FPS
1080p
42.7 FPS
1440p
36.1 FPS
1440p
33.6 FPS
2160p
22.7 FPS
2160p
21.1 FPS
w1440p
31.5 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
81.3 FPS
1080p
76.4 FPS
1440p
66.1 FPS
1440p
62.1 FPS
2160p
44.2 FPS
2160p
41.5 FPS
w1440p
58.7 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
116.6 FPS
1080p
110.0 FPS
1440p
96.1 FPS
1440p
90.6 FPS
2160p
65.7 FPS
2160p
61.8 FPS
w1440p
86.0 FPS
w1440p
81.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
187.3 FPS
1080p
177.4 FPS
1440p
156.0 FPS
1440p
147.6 FPS
2160p
108.6 FPS
2160p
102.5 FPS
w1440p
140.4 FPS
w1440p
132.7 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 3 3100
  • The Ryzen 3 3100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 3 3100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 3 3100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 3 3100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 specifications

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 Architecture

i9-10900K Ryzen 3 3100
CodenameComet LakeZen 2
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Ryzen 3 (Zen 2)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020May 2020

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 Cache

i9-10900K Ryzen 3 3100
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 Cores

i9-10900K Ryzen 3 3100
# of Cores104
# of Threads208
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 Features

i9-10900K Ryzen 3 3100

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 Notes

i9-10900K Ryzen 3 3100

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 Performance

i9-10900K Ryzen 3 3100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier37.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 3.9 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 Physical

i9-10900K Ryzen 3 3100
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelTSMC
PackageFC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm7 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM4
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 3 3100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments