i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 - Need For Speed: Heat RX 6600S - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Athlon II X3 450

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
2622 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1058 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 in Need For Speed: Heat using RX 6600S - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 450

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.3 FPS
1080p
29.2 FPS
1440p
54.6 FPS
1440p
23.0 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
2160p
14.1 FPS
w1440p
47.2 FPS
w1440p
19.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
115.5 FPS
1080p
55.0 FPS
1440p
94.3 FPS
1440p
44.7 FPS
2160p
62.1 FPS
2160p
29.1 FPS
w1440p
83.2 FPS
w1440p
39.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
161.8 FPS
1080p
80.8 FPS
1440p
134.0 FPS
1440p
66.4 FPS
2160p
90.6 FPS
2160p
44.1 FPS
w1440p
119.3 FPS
w1440p
58.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
254.3 FPS
1080p
132.4 FPS
1440p
213.4 FPS
1440p
109.8 FPS
2160p
147.6 FPS
2160p
74.2 FPS
w1440p
191.3 FPS
w1440p
97.8 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 450
  • The Athlon II X3 450 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 specifications

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 Architecture

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 450
CodenameComet LakeRana
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX450WFK32GMADX450WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Sep 2010

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 Cache

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 450
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 Cores

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 450
# of Cores103
# of Threads203
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 Features

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 450
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 Notes

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 450

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 Performance

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 450
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier37.0x16.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.4 V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 Physical

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 450
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 450 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments