i5-12400 vs i9-10900K - Need For Speed: Heat Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 i9-10900K

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
22851 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
3099 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i5-12400 vs i9-10900K in Need For Speed: Heat using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 i9-10900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
39.1 FPS
1080p
39.6 FPS
1440p
30.8 FPS
1440p
31.2 FPS
2160p
19.0 FPS
2160p
19.2 FPS
w1440p
26.6 FPS
w1440p
27.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.8 FPS
1080p
71.6 FPS
1440p
57.6 FPS
1440p
58.2 FPS
2160p
37.8 FPS
2160p
38.2 FPS
w1440p
50.7 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
102.5 FPS
1080p
103.5 FPS
1440p
84.4 FPS
1440p
85.3 FPS
2160p
56.7 FPS
2160p
57.1 FPS
w1440p
74.8 FPS
w1440p
75.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
165.8 FPS
1080p
167.5 FPS
1440p
138.0 FPS
1440p
139.4 FPS
2160p
94.3 FPS
2160p
95.1 FPS
w1440p
123.1 FPS
w1440p
124.5 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-12400 vs i9-10900K specifications

i5-12400 vs i9-10900K Architecture

i5-12400 i9-10900K
CodenameAlder Lake-SComet Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core i9 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL4V SRL5Yunknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-12400 vs i9-10900K Cache

i5-12400 i9-10900K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs i9-10900K Cores

i5-12400 i9-10900K
# of Cores610
# of Threads1220
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs i9-10900K Performance

i5-12400 i9-10900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier25.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.3 GHz

i5-12400 vs i9-10900K Physical

i5-12400 i9-10900K
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200

Compare i5-12400 vs i9-10900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments