i3-7320 vs i3-11300 - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i3-11300

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
12078 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
2959 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-7320 vs i3-11300 in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i3-11300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.3 FPS
1080p
37.3 FPS
1440p
24.1 FPS
1440p
29.7 FPS
2160p
15.2 FPS
2160p
18.7 FPS
w1440p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
25.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.8 FPS
1080p
68.0 FPS
1440p
46.5 FPS
1440p
55.8 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
2160p
37.3 FPS
w1440p
41.3 FPS
w1440p
49.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
98.6 FPS
1440p
69.0 FPS
1440p
81.9 FPS
2160p
47.0 FPS
2160p
55.9 FPS
w1440p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
73.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.2 FPS
1080p
160.0 FPS
1440p
113.9 FPS
1440p
134.1 FPS
2160p
78.8 FPS
2160p
93.1 FPS
w1440p
102.1 FPS
w1440p
120.5 FPS
i3-7320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i3-11300

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-11300 specifications

    i3-7320 vs i3-11300 Architecture

    i3-7320 i3-11300

    i3-7320 vs i3-11300 Cache

    i3-7320 i3-11300

    i3-7320 vs i3-11300 Cores

    i3-7320 i3-11300

    i3-7320 vs i3-11300 Features

    i3-7320 i3-11300

    i3-7320 vs i3-11300 Performance

    i3-7320 i3-11300
    Frequency4.1 GHz3.90 GHz

    i3-7320 vs i3-11300 Physical

    i3-7320 i3-11300

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-11300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments