i3-7320 vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed: Heat GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-7320 vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed: Heat using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.3 FPS
1080p
35.8 FPS
1440p
24.1 FPS
1440p
28.5 FPS
2160p
15.2 FPS
2160p
18.0 FPS
w1440p
21.0 FPS
w1440p
24.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.8 FPS
1080p
65.6 FPS
1440p
46.5 FPS
1440p
53.8 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
2160p
36.1 FPS
w1440p
41.3 FPS
w1440p
47.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
95.4 FPS
1440p
69.0 FPS
1440p
79.2 FPS
2160p
47.0 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
w1440p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
70.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.2 FPS
1080p
155.0 FPS
1440p
113.9 FPS
1440p
129.9 FPS
2160p
78.8 FPS
2160p
90.3 FPS
w1440p
102.1 FPS
w1440p
116.9 FPS
i3-7320
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-10100 specifications

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Cache

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Cores

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Features

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Performance

    i3-7320 i3-10100
    Frequency4.1 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP51 W65 W

    i3-7320 vs i3-10100 Physical

    i3-7320 i3-10100

    Compare i3-7320 vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments