i3-12100 vs i3-7300 - Need For Speed: Heat R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-7300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
6436 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2317 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-12100 vs i3-7300 in Need For Speed: Heat using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-7300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.3 FPS
1080p
47.4 FPS
1440p
44.6 FPS
1440p
37.2 FPS
2160p
28.2 FPS
2160p
23.5 FPS
w1440p
39.0 FPS
w1440p
32.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.7 FPS
1080p
83.5 FPS
1440p
79.3 FPS
1440p
67.8 FPS
2160p
53.4 FPS
2160p
45.5 FPS
w1440p
70.6 FPS
w1440p
60.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
141.1 FPS
1080p
119.7 FPS
1440p
114.0 FPS
1440p
98.4 FPS
2160p
78.5 FPS
2160p
67.6 FPS
w1440p
102.3 FPS
w1440p
88.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
224.0 FPS
1080p
191.9 FPS
1440p
183.3 FPS
1440p
159.6 FPS
2160p
128.8 FPS
2160p
111.6 FPS
w1440p
165.5 FPS
w1440p
143.9 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-7300
  • The i3-7300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-7300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-7300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-7300
CodenameAlder Lake-SKaby Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62SR359
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i3-7300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-7300
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-7300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-7300
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-7300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-7300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier33.0x40.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-7300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-7300
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-7300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments