i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Need For Speed: Heat TITAN V - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Need For Speed: Heat using TITAN V - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
112.9 FPS
1080p
109.9 FPS
1440p
86.7 FPS
1440p
85.8 FPS
2160p
54.8 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
w1440p
75.7 FPS
w1440p
74.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
174.5 FPS
1080p
170.6 FPS
1440p
139.7 FPS
1440p
138.5 FPS
2160p
94.6 FPS
2160p
93.7 FPS
w1440p
124.5 FPS
w1440p
123.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
236.0 FPS
1080p
231.2 FPS
1440p
192.7 FPS
1440p
191.2 FPS
2160p
134.4 FPS
2160p
133.2 FPS
w1440p
173.4 FPS
w1440p
172.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
359.2 FPS
1080p
352.6 FPS
1440p
298.7 FPS
1440p
296.5 FPS
2160p
213.9 FPS
2160p
212.2 FPS
w1440p
271.1 FPS
w1440p
269.0 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments