i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 - Minecraft RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
2571 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1015 Pts

Minecraft

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 in Minecraft using RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
756.7 FPS
1080p
296.8 FPS
1440p
345.8 FPS
1440p
135.6 FPS
2160p
172.9 FPS
2160p
67.8 FPS
w1440p
277.5 FPS
w1440p
108.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
809.4 FPS
1080p
386.9 FPS
1440p
437.6 FPS
1440p
203.3 FPS
2160p
248.8 FPS
2160p
113.4 FPS
w1440p
366.4 FPS
w1440p
169.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
862.2 FPS
1080p
477.1 FPS
1440p
529.4 FPS
1440p
271.1 FPS
2160p
324.6 FPS
2160p
159.0 FPS
w1440p
455.4 FPS
w1440p
229.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
967.7 FPS
1080p
657.3 FPS
1440p
713.0 FPS
1440p
406.5 FPS
2160p
476.3 FPS
2160p
250.3 FPS
w1440p
633.2 FPS
w1440p
350.4 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 440
  • The Athlon II X3 440 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 specifications

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Architecture

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
CodenameComet LakeRana
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX440WFK32GIADX440WFGIBOXADX440WFK32GMADX440WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2010

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Cache

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Cores

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
# of Cores103
# of Threads203
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Features

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Notes

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Performance

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 Physical

i9-10900K Athlon II X3 440
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Athlon II X3 440 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments