i5-13600K vs i3-12300 - Minecraft Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks

Graphics 384SP Mobile with Intel Core i5-13600K

Minecraft

Graphics 384SP Mobile with Intel Core i3-12300

i5-13600K i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts

14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts

3550 Pts

Minecraft

i5-13600K vs i3-12300 in Minecraft using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K i3-12300

Ultra Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	459.5 FPS
1080p	412.5 FPS
1440p	204.0 FPS
1440p	190.2 FPS
2160p	100.2 FPS
2160p	93.4 FPS
w1440p	162.7 FPS
w1440p	151.7 FPS

High Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	548.8 FPS
1080p	503.8 FPS
1440p	285.1 FPS
1440p	269.1 FPS
2160p	157.8 FPS
2160p	148.8 FPS
w1440p	236.6 FPS
w1440p	223.2 FPS

Medium Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	638.2 FPS
1080p	595.1 FPS
1440p	366.1 FPS
1440p	348.0 FPS
2160p	215.5 FPS
2160p	204.1 FPS
w1440p	310.4 FPS
w1440p	294.7 FPS

Low Quality

Resolution	Frames Per Second
1080p	816.8 FPS
1080p	777.8 FPS
1440p	528.3 FPS
1440p	505.9 FPS
2160p	330.7 FPS
2160p	314.8 FPS
w1440p	458.1 FPS
w1440p	437.8 FPS

i5-13600K

The i5-13600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

i3-12300

The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-13600K vs i3-12300 specifications

i5-13600K vs i3-12300 Architecture

	i5-13600K	i3-12300
Chipsets	Z690, Z790	Z690, H670, B660, H610
Codename	Raptor Lake-S	Alder Lake-S
DDR4 Speed	3200 MT/s	3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed	5600 MT/s	4800 MT/s
ECC Memory	Yes	No
Generation	Core i5 (Raptor Lake)	Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
Launch MSRP	$319	$143
Market	Desktop	Desktop
Memory Support	DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel	DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-Express	Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)	Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#	SRMBD	SRL61
Production Status	Active	Active
Release Date	Sep 27th, 2022	Jan 2022

i5-13600K vs i3-12300 Cache

	i5-13600K	i3-12300
Cache L1	80K (per core)	80K (per core)
Cache L2	2MB (per core)	1.25MB (per core)
Cache L3	24MB (shared)	12MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs i3-12300 Cores

	i5-13600K	i3-12300
# of Cores	14	4
# of Threads	20	8
Integrated Graphics	UHD Graphics 770	UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs	1	1

i5-13600K vs i3-12300 Performance

	i5-13600K	i3-12300
Base Clock	100 MHz	100 MHz
Frequency	3.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Multiplier	35.0x	35.0x
Multiplier Unlocked	Yes	No
PL1	181 W	60W
PL2	181 W	89W
PL2 Tau Limit	Unlimited	28 seconds
TDP	125 W	60 W
Turbo Clock	up to 5.1 GHz	up to 4.4 GHz