i5-11400 vs i3-12300 - Minecraft GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11400 i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

14000 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2700 Pts
3550 Pts

Minecraft

i5-11400 vs i3-12300 in Minecraft using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11400 i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
408.1 FPS
1080p
397.2 FPS
1440p
188.6 FPS
1440p
183.6 FPS
2160p
94.7 FPS
2160p
92.1 FPS
w1440p
151.6 FPS
w1440p
147.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
499.5 FPS
1080p
488.9 FPS
1440p
267.3 FPS
1440p
261.4 FPS
2160p
150.5 FPS
2160p
147.0 FPS
w1440p
223.1 FPS
w1440p
218.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
591.0 FPS
1080p
580.6 FPS
1440p
345.9 FPS
1440p
339.2 FPS
2160p
206.3 FPS
2160p
201.9 FPS
w1440p
294.6 FPS
w1440p
288.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
773.9 FPS
1080p
763.9 FPS
1440p
503.2 FPS
1440p
494.8 FPS
2160p
317.9 FPS
2160p
311.7 FPS
w1440p
437.6 FPS
w1440p
429.8 FPS
i5-11400
  • The i5-11400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-11400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-11400 vs i3-12300 specifications

i5-11400 vs i3-12300 Architecture

i5-11400 i3-12300
CodenameRocket LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL61
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-11400 vs i3-12300 Cache

i5-11400 i3-12300
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-11400 vs i3-12300 Cores

i5-11400 i3-12300
# of Cores64
# of Threads128
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11400 vs i3-12300 Features

i5-11400 i3-12300

i5-11400 vs i3-12300 Notes

i5-11400 i3-12300

i5-11400 vs i3-12300 Performance

i5-11400 i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier26.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i5-11400 vs i3-12300 Physical

i5-11400 i3-12300
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i5-11400 vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments